92军事网 新闻 > 首页 > 军事天地 > 网友分析 > 正文 >


2017-08-15 09:47:24 点击: 来源: 网络转载 反馈

  India 'defeated' China in 1962 war, claims Sanskrit textbook in MP


  A class 8 Sanskrit textbook being taught in the CBSE-affiliated schools in Madhya Pradesh has got the facts wrong about the 1962 Sino-Indian war, as it claims that India had defeated China.


  A chapter on the country's first prime minister, Jawaharlal Nehru, in the textbook titled 'Sukritika', says with Nehru's efforts, India defeated China.


  Lucknow-based Kriti Prakashan Private Limited, the publisher of the book, admitted its mistake and attributed it to a human error.


  The chapter, titled 'Shri Jawaharlal Nehru', talks about the Congress stalwart's achievements and admires his acumen after China invaded India in 1962.



  --Shake Hasina (View MyPage) on Aug 11, 2017 10:59 PM | Hide replies

  The question ought to have been:

  Should the government pay heed to Vice-President Hamid Ansari's comment that Muslims felt insecure in India?



  -- mera bharat (View MyPage) on Aug 11, 2017 07:57 PM | Hide replies

  Haha. Books nagpur HQ me chape gaye te?? MP is turning out to be a land of fools under shavraj.



  --by (View MyPage) on Aug 11, 2017 07:39 PM

  just surprised how a ideology which was against our tricolor for such a long time, and its leaders idealogue who were strictly opposing our tricolor, which can be found in their books have suddenly started preaching nationalism, patriotism, those who gave apology letters to the britishers, those who did not hoist the national flag in their organisational office for years have turned towards nationalism. amazing.



  --by avinash kumar (View MyPage) on Aug 11, 2017 07:01 PM | Hide replies

  Sugar and onions mafia pawar want to take shivsena place maybe vacated in future to make nda more corrupt



  --by Kamlesh Shah (View MyPage) on Aug 11, 2017 07:03 PM

  when you are in coalition & in the power sharing, you can't oppose everything for the sake of vote bank, period.



  --by Kamlesh Shah (View MyPage) on Aug 11, 2017 06:58 PM

  If there was no Nehru, than Patel was ready to accept PM post & India could not suffered from Kashmir issue & it was solved long back.



  --by abhirup (View MyPage) on Aug 11, 2017 06:45 PM

  Pawar has a dream of becoming Prime Minister but nobody is supporting him. Always change tracks but all efforts goes vain. Now in maharashtra he can't find any space as it is occupied by Sena & BJP.




  -- KARAN (View MyPage) on Aug 11, 2017 06:34 PM | Hide replies

  Why can not Muslims understand that the Arab thugs Babar built a structure over hindu temple and we are simply correcting that horrible mistake.Hindus need not convince anybody to build temple.



  --by MOHAN LAD (View MyPage) on Aug 11, 2017 04:31 PM | Hide replies

  Modi and his ministers are one thing in public and do their dark deeds out of public camera.



  --by Suresh Tenvillage (View MyPage) on Aug 11, 2017 04:04 PM

  What is so great in it, when you are extracting money in all possible manner from the account holders and general public.

  They should introspect whether they are providing a pint of service against the charges they are collecting from the public.



  --by Parthasarathy Krishna (View MyPage) on Aug 11, 2017 01:44 PM | Hide replies

  Sorry to say this! There are 100s or more happenings in india at the same time? Why hype and minute to minute coverage in TV ENG channels and news?



  --by Kumar Ramaswamy (View MyPage) on Aug 11, 2017 12:04 PM | Hide replies

  True mentality of 65 years of dividing India on communal lines, caste lines, language lines continue with this generation of politicians. How long they will use communal divide to alienate people.



  --by ashok kumar (View MyPage) on Aug 11, 2017 10:07 AM | Hide replies

  Hamid Ansari is merely being true to his religion....

  He is fed up of this Democracy and Secularism!!!

  He wants Islamic rule in India.....



  --by AnandN Rao (View MyPage) on Aug 11, 2017 09:37 AM | Hide replies

  Hamid Ansari stooge of Congress party is a muslim. As long as he was VP he was secure. The last day of his office he is insecure.